隨著2016年高考圣戰緩緩落下帷幕，在“幾家歡喜幾家愁”到來之前考完的寶寶們應該是全世界最幸福的娃了。幸福之處不僅在于十幾年的奮斗終于塵埃落定的感覺如此珍貴，還在于能把所有改革的壓力全拋給下屆的學弟學妹們，自己則可以兩袖清風不帶走一片云彩地say goodbye了。敢問肩負滿滿社會責任感的昂立怎么能袖手旁觀？！

閱讀預測

關于2017年的上海高考英語改革眾說紛紜，題型莫測。變動最大最引人矚目的當屬聽說題型的增加和變動，對此wuli昂立早就推出了備受期待的聽說課程。小編在此要提醒各位來年的斗士們，閱讀題型的變動之大一點不輸聽說。據可靠消息稱2017年閱讀的分值將有一定提高。撤換原先回答問題的題型，可能的代替題型有兩種：一是從一個語篇中挖出四個句子，六選四還原到原文；另一種說法是依照大學英語四級的閱讀題型出題，如下：

Directions: In this section, you are going to read a passage with ten statements attached to it. Each statement contains information given in one of the paragraphs. Identify the paragraph from which the information is derived. You may choose a paragraph more than once. Each paragraph is marked with a letter.

　　Essay -grading Software Officers Professors a Break

　　[A] Imagine taking a college exam, and instead of handing in a blue book and getting a grade from a professor a few weeks later, clicking the “send” button when you are done and receiving a grade back instantly, your essay scored by a software program. And then, instead of being done with the exam, imagine that the system would immediately let you rewrite the test to try to improve your grade.

　　[B] Edx, the nonprofit enterprise founded by Harvard and the Massachusetts Institute of Thnology(MIT) to offer courses on the Internet ,has just introduced such a system and will make its automated(自動的)software available free on the Web to any institutions that wants to use it. The software uses artificial intelligence to grade student essays and short written answers, freeing professors for other tasks.

　　[C] The new service will bring the educational consortium(聯盟)into a growing conflict over the role of the automation education. Although automated grading systems for multiple-choice and true-false tests are now widespread, the use of artificial intelligence technology to grade essay answers has not yet provided widespread acceptance by educations and has many critics.

　　[D] Anant Agarwal, an electrical engineer who is president of Edx, predicted that the instant grading software would be a useful teaching tool, enabling students to take tests and write essays over and over and improve the quality of their answers . He said the technology would offer distinct advantages over the traditional classroom system, where students often wait days or weeks for grades. “There is a huge value in learning with instant feedback,” Dr.Agarwal said, “Students are telling us they learn much better with instant feedback.”

　　[E] But skeptics(懷疑者)say the automated system is no matter for live teachers. One longtime critic, Les Perelman，has drawn national attention several times for putting together nonsense essays that have fooled software grading programs into giving high marks. He has also been highly critical of studies claiming that the software compares well to human grades.

　　[F] He is among a group of educators who last month began circulating a petition(呼吁) opposing automated assessment software. The group, which calls itself Professionals Against Machine Scoring of Student Essays in High-Stakes Assessment, has collected nearly 2,000 signatures, including some from famous people like Noam Chomsky.

　　[G] “Let’s face the realities of automatic essay scoring,” the group’s statement reads in part. “Computers cannot ‘read’. They cannot measure the essentials of effective written communication: accuracy, reasoning, adequacy of evidence, good sense, ethical (倫理)position, convincing argument, meaningful organization, and clarity, among others.”

　　[H] But EdX experts its software to be widely by schools and universities. It offers free online classes from Harvard, MIT and the University of California-Berkeley; this fall, it will add classes from Wellesley, Geoge town and the University of Texas. In all, 12 universities participate in EdX, which offers certificates for course completion and has said that it plans to continue to expand next year, including adding international schools.

　　[I] The EdX assessment tool requires human teachers, or graders 100 essay or essay questions. The system then uses a variety of machine-learning techniques to train itself to be able to grade any number of essays or answers automatically and almost instantly. The software will assign a grade depending on the scoring system created by the teacher, whether it is a letter grade or numerical (數字的) rank.

　　[J] Edx is not the first to use the automated assessment technology, which dates to early computers in the 1960s. there is now a range of companies offering commercial programs to grade written test answers, and four states — Louisiana, North Dakota, Utah and West Virginia — are using some form of the technology in second schools. A fifth, Indiana, has experimented with it. In some cases the software is used as a “second reader”, to check the reliability of the human graders.

　　[K] But the growing influence of the Edx consortium to set standards is likely to give the technology a boost. On Tuesday, Stanford announced that it would work with EdX to develop a joint educational system that will make use of the automated assessment technology.

　　[L] Two start-ups, Coursera and Udacity, recently founded by Stanford faculty members to create “massive open online courses,” or MOOCs, are also committed to automated assessment systems because of the value of instant feedback. “it allows students to get immediate feedback on their work, so that learning turns into a game, with students naturally gravitating (吸引) to ward resubmitting the work until they get it right, ” said Daphne Koller, a computer scientist and a founder of Coursera.

　　[M] Last year the Hewlett Foundation, a grant-making organization set up by one of the Hewlett-Packard founders and his wife, sponsored two $100,000 Prizes aimed at improving software that grades essay and short answers. More than 150 teams entered each category. A winner of one of the Hewlett contents, Vik Paruchurt was hired by EdX to help design its assessment software.

　　[N] “One of our focus is to help kids learn how to think critically,” said Vuchic, a program officer at the Hewlett Foundation. “It’s probably impossible to do that with multiple-choice tests”. The challenge is that this requires human graders, and so they cost a lot more and they take a lot of more time.

　　[O] Mark D.Shermis, a professor at the University of Akron in Ohio, supervised the Hewlett Foundation’s contest on automated essay scoring and wrote a paper about the experiment. In his view, the technology — though imperfect — has a place in educational settings.

　　[P] With increasing large class, it is impossible for most teachers to give students meaningful feedback on writing assignments, he said Plus, he noted, critics of the technology have tended to come from the nation’s best universities, where the level of teaching is much better than at most schools.

[Q] “Often they come from very famous institutions where, in fact, they do a much better job of providing feedback than a machine over could,” Dr. Shermis said. “There seems to be a lack of appreciation of what is actually going on in the real world.”

　　46 Some professors in education are collecting signatures to voice their opposition to automated essay grading.

　　47 using software to grade students’ essay saves teachers time for other work.

　　48 the Hewlett contests aim at improving essay grading software.

　　49 Though the automated grading system is widely used in multiple-choice tests, automated essay grading is still criticized by many educators.

　　50 Some people don’t believe the software grading system can do as good a job as human graders.

　　51 Critics of automated essay scoring do not seem to know the true realities in leses famous university.

　　52 Critics argue many important aspects of effective writing cannot measured by computer rating programs.

　　53 As class size grows, most teachers are unable to give student valuable comments as to how to improve their writing.

　　54 The automated assessment technology is sometimes used to double check the work of human graders.

55 Students find instant feedback helps their learning considerably.

除此之外，閱讀還另增了summary writing的題型，我們可以把這看作為又一篇小作文，考驗的是同學欣賞理解及綜合概括的能力。但大多數學生感覺無從下手，如今高考對于“output”要求越來越高確實對習慣背誦甚至“死記”規律的國內學生來說是莫大的考驗。而作為昂立學子的優勢就此顯現了，我們高中讀寫課已將此列入課堂教學內容了喲！

小編來為大家理一理到底如何寫這要了親命的summary才能得到高分。

各位同學一定要避免面面具到，事無巨細的概括方式，并且千萬切忌用文章的原句。首先，細讀原文，掌握文章的大意和結構，明確全文主題和各段的段落大意。然后，草擬寫作提綱，應包括略去不必要細節的文章主要事實。記得要與原文保持協調安排好篇幅比例，即詳略得當。期間，要注意段落的連貫和句子間的銜接。最后，檢查并謄寫，注意詞數是否符合規定要求。

作文預測

   小昂認為來年作文話題依然圍繞生活中常見現象或事例，文體應該會是比較類和圖片類的議論文。如：

1． 真人秀火爆的現象討論

2． 在旅游景點看人多于看景的現象討論

3． 旅游過程中不文明現象的討論

4． 關于社會上時有發生的“道德綁架”現象的討論

5． “留學潮”的反思

以上內容分享2017年高考閱讀及寫作題型及考點預測，同學們如果想了解更多2016年高中英語復習重點，請關注上海高考英語培訓_昂立高考英語培訓官方網站.我們會安排專業老師解答的疑問。想要咨詢高考英語培訓課程，請猛戳昂立外語網站：http://www.canatilla.net/或電話咨詢：400-820-8062

掃一掃，獲取更多精彩資訊

• 上一篇：高考英語|2017年聽說題型及考點預測
• 下一篇：高考英語|2017年高考語法預測（語法&翻譯篇）